There’s a new review by Paul Kincaid of Psychological Methods To Sell Should Be Destroyed from Interzone 222 May/June 2009.  The collection has been out about a year so I thought I’d reflect a bit.

Kincaid’s review is mostly positive, but negative in interesting ways.  He dislikes the collection’s title and the first two stories, but that’s balanced by thoughtful analysis and a great appreciation for “Sidewalk Factory.”

“Best of the bunch, however, is…‘The Sidewalk Factory: A Municipal Romance’, which is worth the whole of the rest of this chapbook put together. It is a sort of anti-utopia: the inhabitants of an island state subject to increasingly absurd government decrees. The geography of the island, its regimented social structure, and its relationships with the client states along the mainland all recall Thomas More’s novel, but then it is twisted to distort the image just enough to make it interesting. I loved the fact that if you were able to accept the surreal elements of the world, the whole thing made a coherent sense. This was a place just on the edge of being believable, and within that shape everything the characters do and everything that is done to them makes perfect sense. This could become one of my favourite stories of the year.”

I haven’t read Thomas More’s Utopia, but perhaps will soon. Wikipedia calls it a novel but the county library lists it as non-fiction. Probably because it’s old and revered. Maybe someday my novels will be considered non-fiction.

Reading the widely-varying reviews of Psychological Methods To Sell Should Be Destroyed has been fascinating.  There has been no consensus. One reviewer’s favorite is another reviewer’s dog food.  It’s not good to dwell too much on reviews, but reviews do help indicate if the writing is connecting with a reader.

What I take from the disparity in reviewer tastes is that I’m doing the right thing. I’m not writing to please an audience; I’m writing because I’m driven to. I have ideas and I need to express them. I don’t expect to please everyone but I hope I please enough people so that I can keep getting published. That’s a pretty basic formula, and I’m sure every writer has their own way of approaching it.

And, speaking of connecting with readers, I was at Wiscon last weekend. A woman saw my name tag and said she bought the collection there last year and enjoyed it a lot. She especially loved “Suspension” and “Tales of the Golden Legend.” Which Kincaid did not care for at all. So, as I said, no consensus, but some interesting responses.

Something else Kincaid mentioned in his review is the use of surrealism.

The stories “are exercises in surrealism, an increasingly dominant mode among the upcoming generation of writers of the fantastic. But where some seem to feel that all they need to do is pile absurdity upon absurdity, not realising how hard it is to attract and retain the sympathy of the audience when anything can happen and so there are no consequences, Wexler introduces carefully controlled absurdity as if this is the way the world really is. It is that assumption of the real underlying the surreal that makes these much the better stories.”

He’s right about what I’m trying to do, convey the real and the surreal and maintain sympathy and empathy for my characters and situations. It’s funny that surrealism is an increasingly dominant mode in fantastic fiction because it’s what I’ve always done. If I allowed someone to read my horrendous early stories, starting with a creative writing class in 1982, they would see that I’ve been writing this way all along.

My interest in surrealism started with the visual art, probably Salvadore Dalí first, and then others. In fiction…I really can’t remember. Later, J.G. Ballard, Robert Coover, and Angela Carter, but when I first started writing I hadn’t heard of them. Kurt Vonnegut and Monty Python, definitely. Also, I was a subscriber to Fantasy and Science Fiction in the late ’70s/early ’80s and I’m sure I picked up some things there. The fat and fabulous 30th anniversary edition came out during that period.

Has it now become a “thing”? I hope someone does the definitive anthology, to go along with Slipstream, Steampunk, and New Weird. Or rather, I hope someone does the definitive anthology and includes me. Although, as I posted here, I’m part of the New Offbeat. Can I be both New Surreal and New Offbeat? It’s likely that the two are connected, with intertwined retinas and an auditorium full of attentive listeners waiting for the right color to crawl across their brains.

New review of Psychological Methods To Sell Should Be Destroyed, by Paul Di Filippo in the July Asimov’s (which is out now). “…intriguing conceits…couched in the most restrained yet emphatic and subtle prose, a style simultaneously droll and tragic, despairing and optimistic, wounded and triumphant.”

Online here.

From Paul Witcover’s review of Psychological Methods To Sell Should Be Destroyed in Realms of Fantasy.

Wexler “builds his stories around flesh-and-blood people, human beings who, amid their bizarre surroundings and off-kilter circumstances, engage our feelings as well as our intellects….These are not stories of grand awakenings but of small epiphanies.  They are as much about disenchantment as they are about enchantment.  And they are funnier than you might think, especially “Tales of the Golden Legend,” which features such sage advice as “We can’t always do what bread says.”  How true!”

Jason Pettus of the intriguing website the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography (CCLP) has picked my collection Psychological Methods to Sell Must Be Destroyed for his list of best experimental books of 2008. There are some interesting-looking books mentioned, and I’m pretty happy about showing up on a list with M.John Harrison.

I first came across CCLP after I read Jack O’Connell’s The Resurrectionist, a book that had some fine writing but ultimately disappointed me. I was curious what people were saying about it and looked at reviews on Goodreads.com.  Jason Pettus’s review echoes some of the problems I had with the book, and so I clicked on the link to his website, where the review had originally appeared. I looked around the site briefly, planning to return when I had more time. Some weeks later I was looking at a post–on a blog, but I don’t remember which blog—about writer’s problems with reviewers. I clicked on a link to David Louis Edelman’s blog post on standards that a review should follow. The post ended with mentions of some reviews of his novel that reflected these standards, one of which was from CCLP.

After reading Edelman’s post I went back to CCLP, looked around some more, and queried about sending a review copy of Psychological Methods to Sell Must Be Destroyed, and was pleased with the ensuing thoughtful and intelligent, review.

Besides book reviews, CCLP collects interesting photographs from various sources (for example here), and also links to news reports, etc., with commentary.

I don’t have a lot of time for reading blogs (or writing one), but CCLP is one I try to visit often.